Latest Contributions by AmirBar-Maor

@-_Ashley-B-Potter_- my comment was from 2014. Back then we worked with the State of Montana (MSL) and the State of Utah (SITLA, AGRC, BLM). Since then BLM has also adopted the parcel fabric and for the most part moved to the new parcel fabric in ArcGIS Pro.  Which organization do you work for? in which state? maybe @MikeZummo or @JerryNeff can help. ... View more

@DenverBilling  Overwriting feature classes can be dangerous... I usually delete the feature dataset on my enterprise before copying the updated feature dataset from staging. Then you can follow the steps to publish it for editing.  This process is well documented here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/data/parcel-editing/workflow-publishpf.htm   ... View more

And here is another idea, assuming I understand it right 🙂   The good thing about records is that they are a simple feature class and you can edit any attribute you want. From my understanding, the records were not created correctly and you want to recreate them. In that case the steps would be: Open the Attribute table and select all the record features Delete them Save edits Run the geoprocessing tool Create Parcel Records. You can use an expression if you want to refine the resulting record name. But... you probably already created some records since the migration in December that you want to keep. In that case: Make sure to only select the records that were created during data migration. You can use the editor tracking field for that. Likewise, for the input parcel features for the geoprocessing tool Create Parcel Records - select the features that were created in December. You can use the editor tracking field for that. You can batch-update the record type in the attribute table. Select the records you want to update and use the Calculate field to update them. You can even temporarily join the records table to another table if you need to. Hopefully one of these answers helps you and others in the community ... View more

@KatClifton  If you are upgrading from the ArcMap Parcel Fabric to the new one you do not need this step. This tool is only intended for customers who used the old ArcMap COGO schema (string-based). ... View more

@RickHollatz thanks for reporting. We plan to address that. ... View more

The parcel fabric uses standard geodatabase topology, and since topology runs on the entire table, ignoring any filtering, it is not possible for it to ignore certain parcel states. Maybe a better location for such an idea, for topology to ignore certain features using a SQL query, should be part of the geodatabase ideas?! ... View more

The Highlight Gaps and Overlaps tool has been enhanced to work on all visible layers with ArcGIS Pro 3.3. Using subtypes can add complexity to your rules, layers, and editing feature templates - so make sure you really need them. ... View more

Closing the idea: No clarifications provided No other users found value in it ... View more

This is not an idea but a question ... View more

@JeffWard  In this example, using ArcGIS Pro 3.3,  the curve entry was changed from 'Delta Angle' to 'Arc Length'. Both values reflect the data as it was entered. This allows the user to compare the entered data to the entries in the traverse grid. Did we solve the problem? or are you asking for a 'refresh' button to show you the values in a certain way = Delta Angle, chord, Arc Length? Couldn't that just be a label expression that shows all 3 for any curve?       ... View more

As an SDK sample (Add-In) ... View more

We no longer plan to make any enhancements to ArcMap Parcel Fabric. The new parcel fabric does not have line categories. ... View more