Latest Contributions by spatialcoder

‎02-22-2024

Following additional research and testing. Adding the ESRI Reprojector Transformer before the GeometryFilter worked. But, in order to make this work, the source projection file is needed. 1. If the user has the prj file, they can import it into the "Source Coordinate System" parameter. By using the "Select "Source Coordinate System" list of options. (See the screenshot). 2. Running the complete workflow after importing the projection file will provide the transformed data with the newly projected data. Exporting the projection file: If they do not have the prj file, they can run the ESRIReprojector to shapefile output. Load it into ArcGIS Pro and then export the projection file from there. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.1/help/mapping/properties/specify-a-coordinate-system.htm

‎02-12-2024

I am currently working with some data I have that is in .ffs format (FME Feature Store), and I am working to use the Data Interoperability Extension to migrate the data into a shapefile. I have done so, but there is an issue with the data not projecting correctly when I open ArcGIS Desktop or Pro. Basically the scale shows an E at the end. The data is an extract from the Smallworld platform. So what I am asking here is if I am missing something in the transformation process between reading the data and writing it to a shapefile. At the moment I am using a "Geometry Filter" to split some of the multipart geometries out. So I can capture them as just Points, Lines, or Polygons. That being said, some of these geometries are aggregate geoms, and collections. Example: Collection. Some are lines, and points. I am happy to add more context here, but I am not sure what else to include just yet. Any guidance here would be very helpful. Thank you.

‎06-10-2021

Hello all, I am working to replace the use of MMPK files to use Vector Tile Packages in Survey 123. This seems to work as we would like. There is an exception though for "Automation". We are seeking to generate VTPK files based on the extent of various Feeder we are querying on. I know there isn't an "Extent" to set as a parameter in the Python function for this. So my workaround was to set the extent and clip the layers by the custom extent. I made a change to the "Map" layer properties on the "Extent" tab, then I selected the "Use a custom extent" and selected the layer. The I updated the "Clip Layers" tab to use "Clip to a custom extent". What I am seeking to have answered is whether there is a way to programmatically update the properties for this extent upon each process? VIA Python My testing in Pro doesn't seem to capture the change of extent when the layer we are selecting the extent by is selected. Any thoughts?

‎05-24-2021

Hi All, We have a project implementation at my organization where we are using the Survey 123 application. What we are having issues with is that our PC images classify our H Drive as the Home Drive, instead of the C Drive. Adding to the above comment, when the application reads this, it will pull the surveys down from ArcGIS Online and then traverse the network again to download onto the H Drive. This causes latency in download times, and inefficient downtime for crews. What I am trying to find out is whether or not we can control where the Application downloads the surveys too, but VIA the application. Any suggestions are welcome. I have worked with my IT group, but for obvious reasons we are being requested to discuss with with ESRI. I am also trying here as well. Thanks for your time.

‎03-18-2021

Why not use the Multiprocessing module that comes with the baseline python libraries? This typically splits things out by "threat" (Logical Core). At least that is the case on the 6 core i& I had that had 12 logical processors. We also use it for multi processing on virtual server environments, which don't normally list logical cores, so your "cpu count" would equate to the cores on the machine. More so, if your machine displays "logical processors", then with the multiprocessing module, you can call the process to split processes out over each logical core that exists. In the case of my 6 core i7, I had 6 cores, but could split the processes out over the 12 logical processors.

‎06-15-2015

I have been working with a data set that calls out a topological error for vertices that are too close to one another (less than 1 meter). My question for you: Do you all know of a tool of set of tools that would work accurately with topology data for polygons that would limit the amount of change in the geometry of each polygon if a vertex that was to close to another were to be "deleted"? Do you also know of one that would do the same for a line? Examples would be for say an island polygon (coastline verts) sharing an edge with tidal water that should all be coincident with a land water boundary.... I know about the capabilities of the Topology tool bar, but I have recently used the simplify polygon tool, which when utilizing the tolerance within the tool set has the capability to output a layer that is very precise, limiting the errors. Also, think of a polygon that overlaps another (overshoot & undershoot).....

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎02-22-2024 07:28 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by spatialcoder

Re: Converting FME Feature Store (FFS) data to a shapefile

Converting FME Feature Store (FFS) data to a shapefile

Automating a Vector Tile Package with Python but updating the extent on Pro

Survey downloads onto Local C Drive

Re: Parallel Processing Factor

Tools suggestions on helping to fix "Short length between Feature Vertices" with Lines and Polygons?

Converting FME Feature Store (FFS) data to a shape...

Survey downloads onto Local C Drive