Latest Contributions by DanielStauning

‎01-23-2023

If you don't request walk times i.e.- if leave the studyAreaOptions parameter blank and run the request, it will try to build a default 1-mile simple ring, do you get a response? This will help pinpoint the issue to creating street network service areas. I'll mention that we do not have good routing data coverage for China. This is described in our documentation for data coverage for routing services. Minimal Street Coverage— Data is limited to some major highways only, secondary and local roads are not covered. Streets have not been ground verified for accuracy, and interchanges may connect incorrectly. Routing in these countries isn't recommended for critical operations.. You may be better off creating 1-mile rings instead 20 minute walk times in any case due to minimal routing data coverage in China. For example, if I drop a random point in Shanghai and try to create a 20 minute walk time, the results are very poor and in some cases the area doesn't even snap to the point. In addition to using simple rings, I would suggest logging an enhancement request with Esri tech support so that we can have a list of users who are requesting better routing data in China.

‎08-03-2022

Hi Daniel, I don't think pagination will help here. The 5,000 Limit is a service limitation that cannot be overridden by using pagination. There is a geography level in between regions and communes (departmentes), for example with the Esri France dataset. https://geoenrich.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/geoenrichmentserver/Geoenrichment/StandardGeographyLevels/FR/FRA_EsriFrance_2021?f=pjson You could perhaps list the departements in a region first and then the communes in each departement. Also, this 5,000 feature limit deserves to be reevaluated and possibly raised in an upcoming release.

‎05-24-2022

The change log for demographic data updates can be found on this what's new page. There's not an exact date decided for the release yet but we're aiming for the latter half of June.

‎05-09-2022

Hello, the business summary variables are currently only available in the Census 2010 boundaries. In the June release of ArcGIS Online, these variables will be available in the Census 2020 boundaries.

‎04-04-2022

Hi Helen, this feature is powered by the GeoEnrichment service and there are a few options on how to configure it. One is to install a GeoEnrichment server locally as Gaurav mentioned. You would then need to license the data for your region and install it to the server. The other option is to configure GeoEnrichment as a utility service in your portal your portal from ArcGIS Online but since you're working in disconnected environment this won't work for you. It will require installing GeoEnrichment server locally in your enterprise and licensing the data for your region. GeoEnrichment server is a component of the Business Analyst Enterprise solution and comes with the U.S data in the standard bundle. I would recommend discussing with your account manager what software you're authorized for and additional data licensing options beyond the U.S.

‎10-14-2021

Hi @Roxana_ElenaUrdea sorry for the late reply but I think what you need are the group and item classes in the arcgis.gis module. When you create a project in the Business Analyst web application, a group is created behind the scenes. All project layers and output from analysis are then stored as items in the portal and shared with that group. Your question seems to be about accessing items, is that correct? If so you can use the content method of the group class to retrieve the list of items shared with a group. From there you can manage individual items using a variety of methods from the item class. I hope this is helpful- please let us know if you have any follow up questions.

‎10-14-2021

Hi @KevenSuzuki1 Sorry for the late reply, can you try installing this patch to the GeoEnrichment server? It addresses issues with running map reports in BA Enterprise 10.9. https://support.esri.com/en/download/7911

‎03-28-2019

Hi Srikanth, The issue is that this report is not supported for standard geography sites. The traffic profile report is a proximity report that lists traffic data in relation to centroid of a ring buffer. We can look into adding support for standard geography sites for this report in a future release.

‎12-28-2017

Akash, Thanks again for reporting, this bug will be fixed in an upcoming update, but In the meantime, a possible work around for this location would be to define the intersecting geographies info in the study area parameter. In this case, the CBSA and County will be returned as separate features instead of geo-context ID fields for the ring buffer. For example: studyareas=[{"address":{"text":"1026 Military St, Port Huron, Michigan, 48060"},"areaType":"StandardGeography","intersectingGeographies":[{"sourceCountry":"US","layer":"US.Counties"}]},{"address":{"text":"1026 Military St, Port Huron, Michigan, 48060"},"areaType":"StandardGeography","intersectingGeographies":[{"sourceCountry":"US","layer":"US.CBSA"}]}] features: (2) attributes: StdGeographyName: St. Clair County StdGeographyID: 26147 StdGeographyLevel: US.Counties attributes: StdGeographyName: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area StdGeographyID: 19820 StdGeographyLevel: US.CBSA Hope this helps as a workaround for the time being, I'll follow up with you when the bug is fixed. Thanks, Dan

‎12-27-2017

Hi Akash, Thanks for reporting this issue, it seems that it happens when requesting the intersecting geographies, the request works just using the address study area without the intersecting geographies info: https://geoenrich.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World/geoenrichmentserver/Geoenrichment/Enrich?studyareas=[{"address":{"text":"1026 Military St, Port Huron, Michigan, 48060"}}]&f=pjson&token= It looks like it happens with this address specifically because the default 1 mile ring buffer overlaps the Canadian border and something is not handled properly when requesting the intersecting geographies. Thanks for reporting this bug, the GeoEnrichment team is tracking this issue and will provide a fix. To help provide a work around can I ask a few questions about the use case? - Are you interested in generating a ring buffer around this address and returning the demographic variables within that buffer? - Are you interested in the demographic variables within the intersected CBSA and county? Or are you just wanting to know which CBSA and county the address is within? Thanks, Dan

‎07-19-2017

Hi Jude, It looks like your token is valid, however, your account doesn't have permissions to use Geoenrichment. Do you know what role your account has? Is it at least a publisher role? We'll need to have your org administrator check your role to see if you have permissions. It may be that you only have a user role or a custom role without permissions for Geoenrichment. -Dan

‎06-23-2017

Kris, good news, we were able to make a fix to the enrich layer tool to better handle complex polygons like these. Thanks for bringing this use case to our attention- it helps us improve the quality of the software and now we'll be able to get this fix in with an update to ArcGIS Online early next week, I will reply to this thread to let you know when it's available. In the meantime, I can still provide the generalized polygons. I will leave this item published for you until the update next week. http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=016b84298c1441989f3f78f30837a633 Thanks, Dan

‎06-21-2017

Thanks for confirming. It seems that this particular study area exceeds the max size of the request because the polygon borders are so complex, it's roughly 2MB worth of vertices just published by itself. There are a great deal of small roads in this region which contribute to the complexity of the borders. We are investigating the max request size of this tool to see if adjustments can be made for a use case like this. In the meantime, I was able to use the Generalize tool in the editing toolbox within ArcMap to reduce the amount of vertices, I was then able to publish that as a service and enrich it. Please let me know if I can share that output with you or if we can help in any other way.

‎06-20-2017

Kris, thanks for sharing your layer with me. It looks to be a complex polygon issue and in particular with the study area in North Carolina. Note that this single feature seems to have multiple polygons combined into one and the request appears to be exceeding some limitation. Did you intend for this study area to be a multi-part feature? This should still work regardless so we will investigate it. I tested this in a staging environment that has been updated for the next ArcGIS Online release and the only record that isn't enriched is this NC drive time.

‎06-19-2017

Hi Kris, I can help take a look at this, would it be possible for me to test this with your drive time study areas? Is the feature service publicly accessible, or would you be willing to send it to me as a zipped shapefile? Thanks, Dan

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎08-28-2023 10:10 PM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DanielStauning

Re: GeoEnrichment POST request results in internal error (error id: 20010208)

Re: Using featureOffset to return more than 5000 records from standard_geography_query

Re: Geoenrichment API returns error for 2020 Census Tract IDs

Re: Geoenrichment API returns error for 2020 Census Tract IDs

Re: Search and Infographics card not available

Re: BAO: using python API to access projects, reports and custom variables - Status changed to: Needs Clarification

Re: Work Around suggestions for 'unable to export infographic to pdf'

Re: GeoEnrichement call returns errorcode 20990001

Re: GeoEnrichement call returns errorcode 20990001

Re: GeoEnrichement call returns errorcode 20990001

Re: unable to use the generated token on the http request

Re: Enrich Layer producing Invalid Geometry message and not enriching

Re: Enrich Layer producing Invalid Geometry message and not enriching

Re: Enrich Layer producing Invalid Geometry message and not enriching

Re: Enrich Layer producing Invalid Geometry message and not enriching

Re: Using featureOffset to return more than 5000 r...

Re: Geoenrichment API returns error for 2020 Censu...

Re: Work Around suggestions for 'unable to export ...

Re: Is it necessary to install Data Store for Port...

Re: Export to CSV from ArcGIS Online