POST
|
Jon, that helped a lot to understand the label process. Thanks a lot! I ended up completely removing symbol levels and using classes instead as well as hard constraint, fixed position and limited queries for different feature density areas. There are still some parts, where highest labels get removed - I guess this is because of high density of other labels/features in this area (like 1 high priority label is not being placed, but 150+ lowpriority labels instead). I guess the "soft" handling of label placement is something to get used to when switching from standard labeling to maplex engine. Still, it is so much faster than standard label engine.. I have 350.000 Labels on one map of 2x2m and it exports the PDF in under 15 minutes! Alex
... View more
03-01-2012
01:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
283
|
POST
|
Maybe someone can help me with this problem: I have a map with lots of overlying Polygon Labels of different importance. I've sorted these into 5 Layers/Classes to prevent important ones from being moved or overlapped by others. Layer 1: 1 Label, River Placement, Big Font Size Layer 2: 30 Labels, River Placement, Big Font Size Layer 3: 90 Labels, Standard Curved Placement, Medium Font Size Layer 4: 5000 Labels, Standard Curved Placement, Medium to Small Font Size Layer 5: 25000 Labels, Standard Curved Placement, Small Font Size To prevent Labels from higher importance Layers to be moved during labeling process, I set up symbol levels and Label Priority Ranking: Layer 1 drawn first, then Layer 2 etc.. It works just great, except for the most important Labels from Layer 1+2: if I just enable these Layers, the Label is placed fine along the polygon direction as a "River Placement", if I enable the other layers below, the top-labels get moved. Is Maplex ignoring Symbol Levels - or how does the label order work (i.e. First Top Labels Placed, then lower Labels Placed, then Top Labels adjusted?) I try to find a way to freeze the top labels after they are placed..
... View more
02-27-2012
07:01 AM
|
0
|
2
|
772
|
POST
|
XML Reader mapped feature # 24000 OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Total Results: 3841 Complete Feature(s), 0 Incomplete Feature(s), 19184 Referenced Feature(s), 2266 Unreferenced Feature(s), 0 Referencer Feature(s) (NO REFERENCES), 0 Referencee Feature(s) (NO Referencee fields defined), and 0 Duplicate Referencee Feature(s) OSMPipeline::FillInDefinedAreas(TestFactory): Tested 3841 input features -- 68 features passed, 3773 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_multipolygon_filter(TestFactory): Tested 293 input features -- 92 features passed, 201 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_route_filter(TestFactory): Tested 201 input features -- 63 features passed, 138 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_restriction_filter(TestFactory): Tested 138 input features -- 90 features passed, 48 features failed. OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Total Results: 66 Complete Feature(s), 26 Incomplete Feature(s), 206 Referenced Feature(s), 25085 Unreferenced Feature(s), 0 Referencer Feature(s) (NO REFERENCES), 0 Referencee Feature(s) (NO Referencee fields defined), and 0 Duplicate Referencee Feature(s) OSMPipeline::OSM_RemoveTempAttributes(SamplingFactory): Sampled 25291 of 25291 feature(s) OSMPipeline::highway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 25291 input features -- 22953 features passed, 2338 features failed. OSMPipeline::cycleway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22953 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::tracktype_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22953 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::waterway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22946 features passed, 7 features failed. OSMPipeline::railway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22946 input features -- 22555 features passed, 391 features failed. OSMPipeline::aeroway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22555 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::aerialway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22555 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::power_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22547 features passed, 8 features failed. OSMPipeline::man_made_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22547 input features -- 22428 features passed, 119 features failed. OSMPipeline::leisure_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22428 input features -- 22316 features passed, 112 features failed. OSMPipeline::buidling_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22316 input features -- 22316 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::amenity_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22316 input features -- 21312 features passed, 1004 features failed. OSMPipeline::shop_filter(TestFactory): Tested 21312 input features -- 21057 features passed, 255 features failed. OSMPipeline::tourism_filter(TestFactory): Tested 21105 input features -- 21012 features passed, 93 features failed. OSMPipeline::historic_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20964 input features -- 20937 features passed, 27 features failed. OSMPipeline::landuse_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20937 input features -- 20864 features passed, 73 features failed. OSMPipeline::military_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20864 input features -- 20864 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::natural_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20864 input features -- 20769 features passed, 95 features failed. OSMPipeline::route_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20769 input features -- 20768 features passed, 1 feature failed. OSMPipeline::boundary_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20768 input features -- 20742 features passed, 26 features failed. OSMPipeline::sport_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20742 input features -- 20732 features passed, 10 features failed. OSMPipeline::abutters_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20732 input features -- 20732 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::place_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20732 input features -- 20726 features passed, 6 features failed. OSMPipeline::CloseUndefinedAreas(TestFactory): Tested 1796 input features -- 340 features passed, 1456 features failed. FME Configuration: Source coordinate system for reader R_1[OSM] set to `LL84' as read from input data Coordinate System `LL84' parameters: CS_NAME=`LL84' DESC_NM=`WGS84 datum, Latitude-Longitude; Degrees' DT_NAME=`WGS84' EPSG=`4326' GROUP=`LL' MAP_SCL=`1' PROJ=`LL' QUAD=`1' SCL_RED=`1' SOURCE=`Mentor Software' UNIT=`DEGREE' Coordinate System `LL84' as OGC Well Known Text: GEOGCS["WGS84 datum, Latitude-Longitude; Degrees",DATUM["WGS_1984",SPHEROID["World Geodetic System of 1984, GEM 10C",6378137,298.257223563,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","6326"]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433],AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]] Using Dynamic Writer $Revision: 26873 $ ( $Date: 2006-03-01 10:08:47 -0800 (Wed, 01 Mar 2006) $ ) with module GEODATABASE_FILE to write dataset `LOCALPATHmap2' FME API version of module 'GEODATABASE_FILE' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) FME API version of module 'GEODATABASE_FILE' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) This Geodatabase Reader/Writer module has been built using ArcGIS 9 libraries An ArcGIS license is already checked out. The product checked out is 'ArcInfo' Created and connected to the ArcGIS 10.0 File Geodatabase at 'LOCALPATHmap2' All errors encountered while writing features will be ignored as directed by the '_IGNORE_FAILED_FEATURE_ENTRY' keyword The 'HAS_Z_VALUES' keyword is set to 'AUTO_DETECT'. With the exception of MultiPatch feature classes, the dimensionality of new feature classes will be based on the first feature written to the feature class. (Features with no geometry are considered 2D) A default z-value of '0' will be used for all 3D features where z-values are not provided Geodatabase Writer: Not simplifying geometries being written to the Geodatabase Writer mode is 'INSERT' Transactions are being used by the Geodatabase Writer FME Configuration: Destination coordinate system set to input coordinate system `LL84' Geodatabase Writer: Creating table/feature class `relation_restriction' Transaction #1 was successfully committed Geodatabase Writer: Creating table/feature class `relation_route' An error occurred while attempting to create the table 'relation_route'. The error number from ArcObjects is: '-2147219886'. The error message from ArcObjects is: {The table was not found. [relation_restriction]} A fatal error has occurred. Check the logfile above for details GeodatabaseRelationshipFeaturesPipeline::GeodatabaseRelationshipFeatures(SortFactory): Sorted 0 feature(s) Transaction #2 (final transaction) was successfully committed Closing the Geodatabase writer =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Feature output statistics for `GEODATABASE_FILE' writer using keyword `W_1': =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Features Written =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- relation_restriction 1 relation_route 1 ============================================================================== Total Features Written 2 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- FME Session Duration: 31.8 seconds. (CPU: 24.8s user, 1.9s system) END - ProcessID: 4516, peak process memory usage: 196424 kB, current process memory usage: 190008 kB. Failed to copy features (1): A fatal error has occurred. Check the logfile above for details Program Terminating Translation FAILED. Tool execution failed. Done Import. Read 2 features. Failed to execute (QuickImport). Failed at Thu Oct 20 11:56:43 2011 (Elapsed Time: 37.00 seconds) I tried different .osm files, everytime the same error also tried differet tools for osm - shp conversion, all did not work: osm2shp, Osmium, ... OpenStreepMap ToolBox cannot load .osm files either! (Version 1.1, Version 2.0 beta) I have SP1 installed There must be a reason why all these programs don't work for me. Does anyone have any suggestion where I could look for help? Thank you, Helmut
... View more
10-20-2011
11:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
948
|
POST
|
I am having problems importing .osm (OpenStreetMap) Data to ArcGis. Using the Quick Data Import, I get the following result: Messages Executing: QuickImport OSM,LOCALPATH\map.osm,"RUNTIME_MACROS,""SCHEMA_CHOICE,""""OSM Community Approved Feature Types"""",COMMUNITY_FEATURE_TYPES,BROAD,CUSTOM_OSM_PIPELINE,<Unused>,CLOSE_AREAS,yes,CUSTOM_AREA,NO,CUSTOM_AREA_FEATURES,<Unused>,_MERGE_SCHEMAS,YES"",META_MACROS,""SourceSCHEMA_CHOICE,""""OSM Community Approved Feature Types"""",SourceCOMMUNITY_FEATURE_TYPES,BROAD,SourceCUSTOM_OSM_PIPELINE,<Unused>,SourceCLOSE_AREAS,yes,SourceCUSTOM_AREA,NO,SourceCUSTOM_AREA_FEATURES,<Unused>"",METAFILE,OSM,COORDSYS,,IDLIST,,__FME_DATASET_IS_SOURCE__,true" LOCALPATH\map2 Start Time: Thu Oct 20 11:56:06 2011 Using translation engine build 6213. Starting Import QuickImport log results will be reported in file: C:\Users\Studio1535\AppData\Roaming\Safe Software\Interoperability\logs\interop-log-20111020-115606-ArcSOCP-a03712-QuickImport_001.log Feature Manipulation Engine 2010 (ESRI DESKTOP) (20100329 - Build 6213 - WIN32) Data Interoperability (node locked-crc) Permanent License. Machine host name is: Studio1535-PC Opening OSM reader for dataset LOCALPATH\map.osm Loaded module 'OSM' from file 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\plugins/OSM.dll' FME API version of module 'OSM' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) Opening GEODATABASE_FILE writer for dataset LOCALPATH\map2 Loaded module 'GEODATABASE_FILE' from file 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\GEODATABASE9.dll' FME API version of module 'GEODATABASE_FILE' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) FME Configuration: No destination coordinate system set Reading schema features FME API version of module 'OSM' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) Loaded module 'XML' from file 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\plugins/XML.dll' FME API version of module 'XML' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) Using Dynamic Reader $Revision: 62876 $ ( $Date: 2009-08-27 11:28:55 -0700 (Thu, 27 Aug 2009) $ ) with module XML to read data from dataset `LOCALPATH\map.osm' The XML Reader is using xfMap 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\xml\osm\osm_xfmap.xml' Pre-processing xfMap 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\xml\osm\osm_xfmap.xml' with macro stylesheet 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\/xfmap/xfmap_macro.xslt'. XML Reader mapped feature # 2000 XML Reader mapped feature # 4000 XML Reader mapped feature # 6000 XML Reader mapped feature # 8000 XML Reader mapped feature # 10000 XML Reader mapped feature # 12000 XML Reader mapped feature # 14000 XML Reader mapped feature # 16000 XML Reader mapped feature # 18000 XML Reader mapped feature # 20000 XML Reader mapped feature # 22000 XML Reader mapped feature # 24000 OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::MakeLinesFromPoints(ReferenceFactory): Total Results: 3841 Complete Feature(s), 0 Incomplete Feature(s), 19184 Referenced Feature(s), 2266 Unreferenced Feature(s), 0 Referencer Feature(s) (NO REFERENCES), 0 Referencee Feature(s) (NO Referencee fields defined), and 0 Duplicate Referencee Feature(s) OSMPipeline::FillInDefinedAreas(TestFactory): Tested 3841 input features -- 68 features passed, 3773 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_multipolygon_filter(TestFactory): Tested 293 input features -- 92 features passed, 201 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_route_filter(TestFactory): Tested 201 input features -- 63 features passed, 138 features failed. OSMPipeline::relation_restriction_filter(TestFactory): Tested 138 input features -- 90 features passed, 48 features failed. OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Completed 100% of intermediate processing OSMPipeline::Ref_RelationMultiPolygon(ReferenceFactory): Total Results: 66 Complete Feature(s), 26 Incomplete Feature(s), 206 Referenced Feature(s), 25085 Unreferenced Feature(s), 0 Referencer Feature(s) (NO REFERENCES), 0 Referencee Feature(s) (NO Referencee fields defined), and 0 Duplicate Referencee Feature(s) OSMPipeline::OSM_RemoveTempAttributes(SamplingFactory): Sampled 25291 of 25291 feature(s) OSMPipeline::highway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 25291 input features -- 22953 features passed, 2338 features failed. OSMPipeline::cycleway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22953 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::tracktype_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22953 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::waterway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22953 input features -- 22946 features passed, 7 features failed. OSMPipeline::railway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22946 input features -- 22555 features passed, 391 features failed. OSMPipeline::aeroway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22555 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::aerialway_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22555 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::power_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22555 input features -- 22547 features passed, 8 features failed. OSMPipeline::man_made_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22547 input features -- 22428 features passed, 119 features failed. OSMPipeline::leisure_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22428 input features -- 22316 features passed, 112 features failed. OSMPipeline::buidling_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22316 input features -- 22316 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::amenity_filter(TestFactory): Tested 22316 input features -- 21312 features passed, 1004 features failed. OSMPipeline::shop_filter(TestFactory): Tested 21312 input features -- 21057 features passed, 255 features failed. OSMPipeline::tourism_filter(TestFactory): Tested 21105 input features -- 21012 features passed, 93 features failed. OSMPipeline::historic_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20964 input features -- 20937 features passed, 27 features failed. OSMPipeline::landuse_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20937 input features -- 20864 features passed, 73 features failed. OSMPipeline::military_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20864 input features -- 20864 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::natural_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20864 input features -- 20769 features passed, 95 features failed. OSMPipeline::route_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20769 input features -- 20768 features passed, 1 feature failed. OSMPipeline::boundary_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20768 input features -- 20742 features passed, 26 features failed. OSMPipeline::sport_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20742 input features -- 20732 features passed, 10 features failed. OSMPipeline::abutters_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20732 input features -- 20732 features passed, 0 features failed. OSMPipeline::place_filter(TestFactory): Tested 20732 input features -- 20726 features passed, 6 features failed. OSMPipeline::CloseUndefinedAreas(TestFactory): Tested 1796 input features -- 340 features passed, 1456 features failed. 50 features scanned 100 features scanned 150 features scanned 200 features scanned 250 features scanned [...] 24250 features scanned 25550 features scanned Merged 22 schema features read from 1 datasets into 22 resulting feature types Read 22 schema features Reading features FME API version of module 'XML' matches current internal version (3.6 20090807) Using Dynamic Reader $Revision: 62876 $ ( $Date: 2009-08-27 11:28:55 -0700 (Thu, 27 Aug 2009) $ ) with module OSM to read data from dataset `LOCALPATH\map.osm' Using Dynamic Reader $Revision: 62876 $ ( $Date: 2009-08-27 11:28:55 -0700 (Thu, 27 Aug 2009) $ ) with module XML to read data from dataset `LOCALPATH\map.osm' The XML Reader is using xfMap 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\xml\osm\osm_xfmap.xml' Pre-processing xfMap 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\xml\osm\osm_xfmap.xml' with macro stylesheet 'LOCALPATHESRI\Data Interoperability Extension\/xfmap/xfmap_macro.xslt'. XML Reader mapped feature # 2000 XML Reader mapped feature # 4000 [...]
... View more
10-20-2011
11:08 AM
|
0
|
5
|
2384
|
POST
|
Great! Your solution looks cleaner - I was trying around with "+" Phyton String Substitution, but couldn't get it to work. This is a nice example. Thank you for your reply.
... View more
09-08-2011
09:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
999
|
POST
|
I think the result window shows it more clearly whats going on: With "Tags" LIKE '%String%' (String = "music") it is doing this: "Start Time: Wed Sep 07 16:24:20 2011 Executing (Select): Select Locations\xxx C:\xxx ""Tags" LIKE 'music'" instead of ""Tags" LIKE '%music%'". Now, when I enter myself %music% as the Parameter for String, it is doing this - the correct query: "Start Time: Wed Sep 07 16:24:45 2011 Executing (Select): Select Locations\xxx C:\xxx ""Tags" LIKE '%music%'" [edit] Great - finally found a solution, although it looks a little bit strange: I have now 2 Variables Tagname = "music" and Perc I'll define as "%" looks like this in the Expression of the Select-Query: "Tags" LIKE '%Perc%%Tagname%%Perc%' and is doing this after run: Start Time: Wed Sep 07 16:49:39 2011 Executing (Select): Select Locations\xxx C:\xxx ""Tags" LIKE '%music%'"
... View more
09-07-2011
03:27 PM
|
0
|
0
|
999
|
POST
|
Try: In the expression variable "Tags" LIKE '%String%' This is enough as at the run time the %string% will be replace by the value of the string i.e. music This is what you are doing: You are creating a variable for a wild card that you want to use. This variable is of data type string. The name of the variable is String (rename it to something else- xyz and use- "Tags" LIKE '%xyx%') You are substituting the variable name %String%/%xyz% in the expression Unfortunately, this isn't working - I tried it before. When I do it like this: "Tags" LIKE '%String%' where the variable string = "music" it wont select any feature, but with this: "Tags" LIKE '%music%' it will select more than 100 features. From my understanding - I am not really an expert, so please ignore if I am saying something wrong - for inline-substitution of String-Variables you need the Variable name, enclosed by %%. For my Select-Expression, I also need enclosing %% before and after the search-tearm as wildcards. I want to select all Features, that have music in the Tag-Coulm (even if its like abcdmusicdefg etc.). Therefore, I need the %-Wildcards. Logically, my Expressio should look like this: "Tags" LIKE '%%String%%' The inner %% for the Variable-String I am getting as a Parameter from the User and the outer %% as Wildcards in the expression. But this gives me an error.
... View more
09-07-2011
02:53 PM
|
0
|
0
|
999
|
POST
|
Hello shitijmehta, I attached 4 images: modelb1.jpg shows the Modelview with the Select-task (where I am having the problem) and modelb2.jpg the Select-task configuration. In this case, I am getting the Expression from outside (modelb3.jpg). But instead of putting the final text in the Expression ("Tags" LIKE '%music%') I want to use the String-Parameter (modelb4.jpg) and use that one instead of the part "music" in the Expression. So you can enter the search-string while opening the programm. I don't know how to substitute the expression with the wildcards % and the String-Variable (which would also need % before/after). Does this make sense to you?
... View more
09-07-2011
02:07 PM
|
0
|
0
|
999
|
POST
|
I have a problem I can not somehow solve on my own: I am trying to make a Select Query in ModelBuilder, using a substitution of a User-Input String and an Expression with Wildcards. The problem is, that I need to use the %-Wildcard, and thats the same as for the string-substitution. This one works: "Tags" LIKE '%music%' whereas this one works not (with the input-string): "Tags" LIKE '%%string%%' I tried all sorts of combinations, like "Tags" LIKE '%'%string%'%' """Tags" LIKE '%"""%string%"""%'""" but it is giving me errors all the time. Do you know the correct format of this query?
... View more
09-07-2011
11:27 AM
|
0
|
7
|
1318
|
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:24 AM
|