POST
|
I am seeing same issue, I am in ArcGIS Pro 2.7.2. It does not happen every time, but very frustrating when it does. I have all settings set to overwrite is OK. Any feedback from ESRI on this issue?
... View more
04-20-2022
06:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1235
|
POST
|
Having the same issue with a pretty extensive model I built in model builder. When I go to validate the model it sits for over an hour, I have to Ctrl-Alt-Delete and kill Pro to reset. Almost impossible to diagnose the issue. I really don't want to rebuild from scratch since I don't know what issue is, it could easily happen again.
... View more
10-28-2021
11:09 AM
|
0
|
0
|
565
|
POST
|
Wanted to post a solution I found in case it can help others. Working in ArcGIS Pro and model builder to run Location Allocation Scenarios on multiple markets. I have a listing of seedpoints that are both Required and Candidates. When I loaded them into the location allocation tool I pointed the Facility Type to my fields that indicated "Required" or "Candidate". After running the tool, I noticed none of my "Required" sites were recognized as required. Finally found documentation that seems to be from ArcGIS online rest points, that when using a field to determine Facility Types, "Required" needs to be coded as a 1 and "Candidate" needs to be coded as 0. I did not see much documentation on this so I figured I would post to this message board. Hope this is helpful. Documentation that helped me find the solution: https://apps.firstmap.delaware.gov/apps/sdk/rest/index.html#//02ss000001vw000000
... View more
10-08-2021
11:16 AM
|
0
|
1
|
347
|
POST
|
I am new to Survey123 and ran into this issue. I created a decent sized survey and it published fine. Then did quite a bit of editing to the original survey. Deleted questions, added questions and tried to republish. Ran into this very non-descript error (honestly I get very frustrated with the lack of detail in Portal error messages). I saved an alternate copy using Ismael's suggestion on this same post but was still getting same error. Finally, I cleared my cache and attempted to republish and it worked for both the original and the cloned survey! I hope this post can help avoid rebuilds for someone in the future.
... View more
07-01-2021
07:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3264
|
POST
|
I am running into the same issue with 10.8.1. Will be upgrading to 10.9 in a few weeks and will post if it fixes the issue.
... View more
06-25-2021
08:27 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2467
|
IDEA
|
Great idea and also suggested in the post below. I think this would make a ton of sense! https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-dashboards-ideas/reset-selectors-to-defaults/idc-p/1056958#M1441
... View more
05-11-2021
05:49 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2490
|
IDEA
|
Kevin, great idea from 2 years ago! Any prioritization on this one ESRI?
... View more
05-11-2021
05:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1909
|
POST
|
I am working in Pro and developed a fairly lengthy model builder process for one set of points, and now want to re-use the model for another set of points. I would normally open the model and start repointing the inputs/outputs into a different geodatabase. For some reason, each of the tools in the model takes about 2 minutes to open and change the output geodatabase and feature class name. This does not happen with other models I have built. I am trying to figure out why this model is different. Has anyone ever seen this slow down when it comes to opening individual tools within a model builder process? Just looking for a quick fix, I do not want to start tracing back all the system configurations, etc. I can have the model rebuilt in half a day at this speed. Not fun work but not impossible.
... View more
02-04-2021
01:12 PM
|
0
|
1
|
715
|
POST
|
I am a heavy user of ArcMap and Pro. Using the Append or Merge tools have always seemed to be extremely slow. Merge/Append of spatial and non-spatial tables seems quite slow compared to much more complicated geo-processing the software is able to complete in a fraction of the time. As an example, today I was appending ~3k polygons to a base of ~450k polygons. Each data set has about 10 fields. The tables have exactly the same schema. The Append tool took 6.5 minutes to complete. An Append process of similar size in Microsoft Access would take about 10-seconds. Is there a simple way to improve the performance/speed of these tools?
... View more
09-10-2020
06:21 AM
|
1
|
0
|
647
|
POST
|
Has anyone noticed that the group filter widget being reset or changed a few times also prevents the regular filter widget from working correctly? Two completely unrelated layers in the Group Filter Widget and Regular Filter Widget. Problem I am seeing is in Enterprise Portal 10.6.1.
... View more
07-30-2020
08:31 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1900
|
POST
|
I just finished a call with ESRI support. There is a known bug where the layer template will not display in some Web Application Themes. The known issue is with the Tab Theme, I was also experiencing the issue with the Foldable Theme. Was finally able to get Smart Editor working with the Billboard theme. I have not tried others yet.
... View more
01-16-2020
01:44 PM
|
2
|
2
|
1682
|
POST
|
-I was doing some trouble shooting and seeing if I could edit > 1000 records on a standard data set. Using ~3,100 county centroids, everything worked fine with making local copy, updating field and the syncing with master. So that threw out my max 1,000 record limit theory. -Stepping up the complexity, I tried the county shapefile/polygons. This not only failed but also crashed my system every time I attempted. So I took a guess and simplified the polygons by 1,000 meters. With the simplified polygons the update process worked. -Using the same approach to my 5,000 record data set, I simplified my polygons by 100 meters. This did not impact the majority of the areas (Most of them were rectangles) but we did have about 1,000 circles. I estimated that the circles probably had ~100 vertices, that were simplified to an octagon. Net change per circle of 92 vertices x 1,000 instances simplified the entire dataset by ~92,000 vertices (All high level estimates). -Once simplified, all the data editing/updates were working. I am assuming that there is not really a record “count” limit but some type of file size/complexity limit that can be handled with this workflow. I hope this is helpful if someone else runs into the issue.
... View more
05-01-2019
11:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
344
|
POST
|
We have an Enterprise deployment and Running 10.6. Having an issue with editing more than 1,000 records at once. Workflow currently involves: 1) Pulling feature service into ArcMap that is running in Portal 2) Create a Local Copy for Editing# 3) Joining an external data table to the local copy 4) Placing the local copy into edit mode 5) Updating a field of the local copy based on one of the join fields 6) Removing the join 7) Save and Stop editing local copy 😎 Sync local copy back up to Portal Before Syncing, all edits appear to be fine in the local copy. After syncing...all edits seem to work if there are less than 1,000 records in the local copy for editing. All edits are ignored when local copy for editing exceeds 1,000 records. Any known fixes or ways to increase this limitation would be greatly appreciated. I am in need to edit ~6,000 records at one time.
... View more
04-29-2019
03:45 PM
|
0
|
1
|
421
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 09-10-2020 06:21 AM | |
1 | 07-30-2020 08:31 AM | |
1 | 06-25-2021 08:27 AM | |
2 | 01-16-2020 01:44 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
01-09-2024
06:36 PM
|