Latest Contributions by LeonS

‎02-02-2024

Agreed. I can configure a Web App Builder application to allow enabling/disabling of pop-ups by the users. I would like to configure the same functionality in an Experience Builder Map Layers widget

‎06-22-2023

There is an existing Idea entry related to this, if you are interested... https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/improve-arcgis-pro-ui-for-entering-enumerated/idc-p/1280799#M24569

‎05-01-2023

Hi Kelly, I think I am having this same issue with the Zone Lookup. I am trying to replace an existing implementation of the Information Lookup with Zone Lookup Instant app. In the Information Lookup app, if search on an address it will zoom and center to the location. In the zone lookup, it seems that it centers on the zone at some set zoom level. The address I searched for may not even appear on the screen. I would like it to center on the search result at a zoom level that I can define. Is there a configuration of the zone lookup app that would support this? Here are the examples: Sample search - '14 Eisenhower Dr' Information Lookup https://eastonma.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=2c820e48880a4ac98b3dbfcb66586ecd Zone Lookup example https://eastonma.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/lookup/index.html?appid=8d11a93dd8f34f3fa258a2e5d5c050b0 Thanks, Leon

‎04-21-2023

The feature layer ending in "_results" is a data view that points back to the other feature layer and has limited privileges for those you want to share the results of the survey with From the ArcGIS Survey123 Resources page: The What data can viewers see options allow you to choose whether viewers can see all records submitted to the survey or only their own submissions. The default is to allow viewers to see all records. ... Saving the settings in the Share results section creates a hosted feature layer view named SurveyName_results (previously named SurveyName_stakeholder), which controls access to the survey's results. You can use this hosted feature layer view in other view-only applications such as ArcGIS StoryMaps.

‎04-20-2023

Related to this UI issue for enumerated domains, the UI for metadata errors messages that are returned in the Fields section within FGDC metadata editor are not easy to work with. This is especially true if you have a large number of fields and/or enumerated domains. Only four errors fit on the screen at one time; any more than four errors and you have to navigate with the tiny little scroll bar that appears on the right. Also, it is not possible to tell which field each error message is associated with so the feedback could be more helpful. At times, I have resorted to exporting the metadata to find errors and make edits using a basic text editor and then imported in the updated metadata.

‎04-19-2023

Hi @KoryKramer, Thank you for reaching out. Here is a screenshot of my "Database Administration" project. The project layout is essentially the Contents pane open on the left, Catalog view in the middle, and other relevant panes on the right (Geoprocessing, Manage Replicas). The series docked panes on the right can get cluttered, when I switch from a project for map making or editing data. I am often closing panes, as a find they are getting in my way. Only to toggle them back open on when I switch to a different type of task. Leon

‎01-30-2023

Are other still having this issue? I'm running Pro 2.9.6 and also showing the error "at least one type of attribute domain is required" in the Fields section after entering a domain for each field in my FGDC metadata. Leon

‎01-26-2023

Hello, I have a distributed collaboration between my Portal and our organizational AGOL. I'm sharing data as copies to AGOL and noticed that a layer within a service in AGOL does not have metadata, but the originating service in my Portal does. I have metadata enabled for both Portal and AGOL w/ the same style. Leon

‎01-26-2023

Hi Sam, This issue sounded familiar. I had a case that I opened up w/ support, but it was three years back. It was similar in that I could set up the initial collaboration and the subsequent syncs would fail. I was getting a return of "completed_with_failures" in my logs. I ran through a number of test cases on my portal to troubleshoot, until we got to the point that we believed the issue may be on the AGOL side. Then there was an AGOL update and the problem went away before we could track it down. Anyway, the tests that I did were: Test collaboration with Hosted feature service (worked for me) Test collaboration with new geodatabase (did not work for me) Test collaboration with new geodatabase in a new collaboration (did not work for me) Test collaboration with new geodatabase in a new collaboration w/ Archiving enabled (not registered as versioned (worked for me) Hope this helps

‎07-25-2022

You are correct only, conflicts are managed during the reconcile process. Since no conflicts were detected during the reconcile process, all the edits that were in default prior to you posting would still be there. This topic should explain the reconcile process and what would be picked up as a conflict: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/geodatabases/overview/manage-traditional-version-conflicts.htm

‎07-22-2022

With traditional versioning, there is no "undo" after a posting to a parent version. You would have to restore your database from a backup to retrieve the "pre-post" data. I haven't used branch versioning, so I won't speak to that.

‎07-18-2022

I would love to have a pane setting that I could customize for Database Administration!

‎07-18-2022

I would like to be able to leverage more attribute rules in my enterprise geodatabase that uses traditional versioning. Currently, much of the attribute rule functionality requires a feature service published from a branched versioned geodatabase or a file geodatabase. I am able to use calculation rules in my data sets, but it would be great to be able to use validation and batch calculation rules too. Many of our data sets do not have field editing workflows and have just one, maybe two, editors. In these cases, our organization would not benefit from the scalability of web based editing through feature services to support mobile users, off-site editing, or high-volume editing. It’s much more efficient for us to continue to use a traditional client to database connection while editing, rather than to configure a feature service based editing workflow. Moving data out of our database management system into a feature database is also not a desirable solution. Thanks, - Leon

‎04-11-2022

I was able to create a connection outside of my organization's network. It seems the integromat website is unreachable from within our firewall. I will work to resolve the issue with our IT department. Thank for you help.

‎04-06-2022

If you are looking to extend the functionality of ArcGIS Pro, similar to how you might extend ArcMap with ArcObjects, then you will want to look into the ArcGIS Pro SDK. I believe the Mobile APIs for the ArcGIS Runtime would be the current functional equivalent of an ArcEngine app built with ArcObjects Link to relevant documentation: https://developers.arcgis.com/documentation/

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Thursday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by LeonS

Re: Add toggle Pop-Ups in Map Layers widget

Re: Why am I still showing red X's next to Lineage and Fields when there are no errors listed at the top?

Re: Zone Lookup not centering on result

Re: Survey creating two feature layers

Re: Improve ArcGIS Pro UI for entering Enumerated Domain into metadata

Re: Custom Pane Settings in "Reset Panes" Menu

Re: Why am I still showing red X's next to Lineage and Fields when there are no errors listed at the top?

Does Distributed Colllaboration copy a layers metadata?

Re: Distributed Collaboration not Syncing Updates

Re: Versioning: Post and reconcile

Re: Versioning: Post and reconcile

Re: Custom Pane Settings in "Reset Panes" Menu

Support for enterprise geodatabases using traditional versioning

Re: Configure Connection to Quick Capture in Make (formerly Integromat)

Re: Does ArcObjects works with ArcGIS 10.9 (and above)?

Re: MouseWheel Zoom to Defined Scales

Re: Zone Lookup not centering on result

Re: Survey creating two feature layers

Collaboration Sync Settings - Auto-adjust for dayl...

Re: Distributed Collaboration not Syncing Updates

Web AppBuilder Custom Widgets