Latest Contributions by MeganBirch

If your Office 365 is in the US Government (GCC) region, this connector is unavailable. This isn't at all clear in the ESRI articles/webinars/etc I've looked at related to this, but it is in the Microsoft Flow documentation.  Hopefully, that will change sometime in the future. Survey123 - Connectors | Microsoft Docs  ... View more

Oh, and we've noticed that there seems to be a scale limitation in the multi-source map.  I don't remember off hand what the particular scale level is, but the upshot is that they can't zoom in as closely on the imagery as they were previously able to.  We've got a ticket in with Hexagon on that as well. ... View more

We've been stuck in a bit of a loop with the Hexagon mapping team, working through some higher priority issues (i.e. getting out of county routing to work). They've not had anything helpful to say about the shield issue to date. At the 9.3 version of Intergraph CAD they have, essentially, 2 mapping windows - the traditional one that displays the .map file and is used for verification and what is called the multi-source map.  The multi-source map can consume services and the extent can be adjusted to match that of the map window.  I think the general idea is to use the multi-source map for reference layers and preserve the .map file for functional layers.  However, based on the feedback from our dispatchers, there is a minimum level of labeling that is desirable for the functional layers and route shields are one of them. ... View more

We've been working with the I/Map Editor tool bar for a couple months now.  And the labeling issues continue.  Labels are run off of annotation feature classes and one of the most frustrating issues we've been having is dealing with the road shields.  In ArcMap the shield labels look fine, but something happens during the publish process causes them to have large text and a tiny shield background. Has anyone done this successfully? ... View more

Not yet.  I expect to be testing it this spring/summer. ... View more

We are also maintaining data in ESRI and moving it over to Intergraph CAD with I/Map Editor.  I think there is a CAD version  (9.3, maybe?) pre-requisite for the I/Map Editor toolbar, so we are waiting on our 911 center to get us a trial. My colleague was the one in the meeting, so I don't have all the details, but will try to keep you updated. And, yes, working with Geomedia is very different than ESRI.  We struggle most with labeling and extent because of the crazy process to create a new SVG symbol. However, I noticed that ArcGIS Pro seems to handle data connections like Geomedia does -- as in you have to connect to all your sources in each project. ... View more

Steve, Were you ever able to resolve this issue?  I am encountering the same problem and am curious if/how you were able to do it.  Like you, the installation seemed to go through fine, but we are having trouble with getting the "failed to get administrator token" error in the configuration step. Thanks, Megan ... View more

Same for us.  Adding the MIME type resolved the problem.  Thanks, Robert! ... View more

That is where that particular .swz already resides.  It is actually part of the flexviewer-3.6 download from ESRI. ... View more

Robert, Do you mean in the main folder for the individual application or in the main folder for all applications.  In other words, in wwwroot/ParcelViewer or just wwwroot? ... View more

We began experiencing a similar issue today.  Our flex viewers work inside the network, but on some machines outside the network, they are getting Error 2032.  We did try testing it on a machine outside our network, running an earlier version of Flash Player and still got the error.  Using fiddler, it seemed to be failing at the textLayout_2.0.232.swz. I don't have the actual text on hand, but it had something to do with the SecureClientPipeDirect failing. Lindsey, for what it's worth, I get the error for your viewer when I open it in IE, but am able to access the application in Chrome and Firefox. ... View more

Thanks for the response.  I was beginning to suspect that might be the case.  I guess we'll just have to continue with the trial and error method of creating "stops" and routing to them. ... View more

I did have the viewer configured so that the layer being identified was the top-most layer.  The problem only occurs when I try to use a mix of feature and dynamic operational layers -- if all the operational layers are dynamic, the popups function normally.  I've looked into the Identify Widget in the past, but, as best I could determine from the documentation/forums, it does not work with secured services.  So, unfortunately that is not an option. For now, I'm just going to make all the operational layers dynamic (viewer is for next week's primary) and test the 3.0 prerelease separately. ... View more