Latest Contributions by FatinRimawi

Hi Kory, Thank you for your suggestion. I will test this and tell you about my finding on this. Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Divya, I'm still struggling with these issues. I hope someone  can help us on this Best, Fatin ... View more

Thank you Duarte for your clarification. I will check this option. Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi, I tried to keep the schema lock option as false, but i notice nothing, Xander. I wish that someone can answer Michael's question, I have the same question Best, Fatin ... View more

Thank you Randy and Richard. I really appreciate your effort on this. It's my first time that I am dealing  with ArcMap scripts, and yeah it's my fault that I did not show the real data relations from the beginning.I thought that graduating in problem may be much better. Thank you for your understanding. Fatin Rimawi ... View more

Thank you Randy. Why not to locate the produced Feature class where the mutual field is located? For example, if we have "x" as a mutual value for the set: (x,y,z,k), the new feature should be produced as same as the location of "x" in FC1. Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Richard, The mutual field “community name” is the place that the other communities come to do elections, so this field could be filled with portion value. For example, (x,y,z,k) has a mutual community which is “x”, so one should conclude that x is the community that y, z, and k doing their election there. At the beginning, my idea was as same as yours, but after showing the results to my team, they suggested to concatenate the values from one FC to another. This can reduce the data entry works and the errors. It is much easier to audit one FC than auditing many FCs.   Best, Fatin ... View more

In addition to the previous conditions, Is it possible to reduce the work of data entry person by using new field that can connect and concatenate all features? This can reduce the percentage of error. Am I right? Kindly notice the following the screenshot to clarify my point. ... View more

This is exactly what we need. Many thanks for you Randy Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Randy, Could you please notice the bellow 2 screenshots? It seems that the python concatenate all the values that have the same ref. However, some values should be considered as a stand alone point,even though it is have the same letter in the Ref. The Ref= Governarate abbreviation_number of community in this geovernarate. The point here is concatenate the values in FC2 with FC1, but with a condition: The communities that don't have any concatenate with other community, it's Ref should stay as it. no need to merge it with other values. What do you think? Best, Fatin ... View more

Thank you Blake for your input, it will see how to implement this on my db. Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Randy, I tried your suggestion but i noticed the following: 1.You entered the values on "table 1" manually.We want the python to read the values direct without any need to write them manually. 2.We want the new REF field to be filled depending on the values of other fields, not on a new table. its like copy and paste. What do you think? Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Richard, You are right. This type of incorrect data can be produced by person who entered the data "data entry". However, these kinds of data should be edited to the correct value"(x,y,z,k)" for this case. To clarify the values that should be written on our REF fields, kindly notice the following examples: Tu001,Tu920,Tu020...etc. Best, Fatin ... View more

Thank you Randy. I will try this and let you know if it works with me. Best, Fatin ... View more

Hi Richard, I really appreciate your reply. Here are the answers for your qualified questions: The communities name could consist multiple letters like “East Jerusalem”., and one work like “Bethlehem”. Well, we are working on unifying the values in our database, and we are auditing the data if anything is wrong. However, the chance in getting misspelling word can present. The amount of data is relatively huge. We are having around 1050 values on the first layer, and around 470 on the second one. We need to automated this process every week or every 2 weeks, depending on the progress in unifying the data. The maximum number for each abbreviation is two like “East Jerusalem: EJ, Tubas: Tu, and Jenin: J” The number of digits in the abbreviation itself could be more than 2 digits. The new REF value is limited to single governorate and the new REF value should contain the numeric values of old Ref, so it becomes a unique value. Kindly notice the order of numeric values on the REF values is not important. I would add that some values on FC2 could be single, or not combined as following screenshot. Best, Fatin ... View more