Latest Contributions by HeikeFriedrichs

‎04-15-2021

To me the esri_apps content is just one big collection of urls managed in the customer's databases. That just doesn't seem right. If it is an on premise installation, that should really be optional. At the very least, there should be a way to hide this content from the users. We have our own software distribution process and users within our organization are not allowed to install programs on their own.

‎10-30-2019

We manage our users and groups in a central ldap-directory. When importing users, the portal checks if there are enough free licences to do the import. The steps are -> "Add members based on existing enterprise users" -> "from a group" -> then number of free licences is checked -> if fewer users in group than number of free licences then the import takes place -> if more users than licences then the import is aborted This makes sense when initially importing the users but is problematic when individual users join the ldap-group later on and we have to import the group again. There is currently no differential import. One of the following would be very helpful: - a differential import (count only the users that have not already been imported and check THEIR number against available licences) - only issue a warning if more users in group than licences available and import as many users as possible (the ones that already exist in portal are rejected anyways)

‎07-26-2017

Hi, not sure this is the right discussion forum (JS API), but here it goes: we published a WFS service into our esri portal and gave it external capabilities files. The files show up nicely, BUT when we request getCapabilities via the browser, the XML-response adds a custom xmlns in the first WFS_Capabilities-tag, that is not part of the file on the server. Is there any way to change that namespace? Any place where it can be configured? It's only a namespace, it does not need to be resolved. It should not contain the portnumber or the servername. Thanks, Heike

‎07-26-2017

Hi, sorry for the delay. I had given up hope that anybody would answer. We found two soulutions (both work): - we added a (redundant) field in the table with the two fields concatenated and use that combined field in the search widget instead - we added two dijit Input fields and a search button in the map as a completely separate search option, onClick on the button starts a query that gives you full flexibility If field #1 (schiebersearch1) contains data, its content gets searched in the database field ROHRBEZEICHNUNG (caseinsensitive and via like match) if both Inputs were filled, the where String continues with "and" field #2 (schiebersearch2) gets searched in the database field SCHIEBERNUMMER see below (hope that makes sense) Solution 1 is much easier, if you have control over your data ----------------------------------- var schieberSearch = new Query(); schieberSearch.where=""; [...] schieberSearch.where="lower(ROHRBEZEICHNUNG) like '" + dojo.byId("schiebersearch1").value.toLowerCase() + "%'"; if(dojo.byId("schiebersearch2").value.length>0){ if(schieberSearch.where.length>0) schieberSearch.where=schieberSearch.where + " and "; } schieberSearch.where=schieberSearch.where +"SCHIEBERNUMMER like '"+dojo.byId("schiebersearch2").value+"%'";

‎05-31-2017

Hi, we use the search widget for a search in a custom feature layer. This works fine if we have an ID field for the layer and can find the result in one single field. Now we want the users to enter TWO search terms seperated by a column delimiter and search for one term in one field and for the other in another field. I was hoping to achieve this by altering the query with the searchQueryParams option, but no luck so far. It it possible to overwrite the where-part of the underlying query with that option? Has anybody got an example for how to do that? Is it possible to hook up an entirely new query with the search widget? Any ideas? We use JS API 3.20, but I guess this is version independent.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	3 weeks ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by HeikeFriedrichs

Re: Add an option to hide esri_apps content in Portal

Differential Import of Users from Enterprise (LDAP) Groups into ArcGIS Portal

WFS_Capabilities custom targetNamespace

Re: Search Widget

Search Widget

Re: Search Widget

Differential Import of Users from Enterprise (LDAP...