IDEA
|
@data_dog EOS has a work around for getting those ortho values saved as the z-geometry value. Eos Tools Pro: How to Configure Orthometric Heights - Eos (eos-gnss.com). ArcGIS Collector (v18.1.0): How to Record Survey-Grade Orthometric Heights - Eos (eos-gnss.com) But yes, I wish would do more to get this built in. Note that the arcade expression for the display of z geometry wasn't working in the web viewers, but worked fine in field apps. Bad Elf and it's Flex unit does this too now, if your looking at cheaper alternatives to the EOS Arrow Gold.
... View more
03-08-2022
10:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
4164
|
IDEA
|
Survey123 implements this as a comma delimited list of values stored in a string field. This can make it difficult to re-use in other areas of ArcGIS. For those of you who use Survey123: How do you use the captured data for these fields? Do you show the layers in other apps/maps besides Survey123? Do you use hidden fields & calculations to split the choices into separate fields? Do you use Arcade in Pop-ups and Dashboards to format the data? Haven't used Survey123, doesn't meet needs. Would you expect to be able to create a multiple choice element for existing fields? If so, do those fields have existing coded value domains? Are they string fields or integer fields? Since it's not available as a way to collect data, I haven't made fields to do this. I think coded value domains would be most fail-safe/elegant. A good way to capture "Other" would be nice. We should be able to have a conditionally visible field to capture it. Would it be beneficial to have a multiple choice UI/UX that stores each choice in a separate "boolean" field instead of a comma delimited list? I can see how this may be helpful, probably not as big a difference maker if using coded domains How many choices per question are anticipated? Maybe a dozen or so at most Would you need to add or remove choices over time? Probably. If so, should that affect previously collected data? I think it's not unreasonable to say we'd have to script repairs or fixes as needed. Would you need to deprecate choices over time? Would you need to edit an existing choice name/values? Most likely If so, should that affect previously collected data? yes, but I'd think one could script the change or manually fix. Do the choices needs any additional information displayed with them, like a description? Or is the value/name enough? Value/Name is fine If so, can you provide a specific example?
... View more
01-05-2022
08:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
7578
|
POST
|
Here's an overview of phones with the dual-frequency chips: https://medium.com/@sjbarbeau/dual-frequency-gnss-on-android-devices-152b8826e1c It's hard to find good info and nothing with respect to Collector. People using gps testing apps were still getting 4m at best. The pixel 4 was just announced with this note: ⁸Dual Band (L1+L5) or (E1 +E5a). Support - coming soon So maybe the phones right now don't have proper software support?
... View more
10-18-2019
01:44 PM
|
2
|
10
|
6486
|
POST
|
I have also been having this problem. I believe it only occurs with raster layers. The first time I go to change it, it rarely registers in the legend, I usually have to change it twice. Changing anything with respect to the symbology causes it to reset (I've tested with Stretch and Classify). This is very frustrating because people reviewing the figures think we're incompetent (eg. "I asked you to change this last time?", "Why does this still say 'Value'?").
... View more
11-16-2018
07:11 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1040
|
POST
|
I believe it works now. Here's what I just tested: 0-1000; -45--1000 (ie: show only -45 to 0) I'm running 2.2.1
... View more
09-04-2018
11:14 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2177
|
POST
|
This bug happens when displaying a raster with classify. For manual classification method (ie removed breaks from another methods), the color scheme will not update or reapply. This bug happens when displaying a raster with classify. Starting with an automated/calculated method (eg. defined interval) and removing a breaks. The method remains on <Defined interval> and any updates to the color scheme resets the classification and the removed breaks return. Data Exclusion: Trying to exclude: “-1000 - -70; 0 - 1000”. It only honors the positive exclusion. “1000 - -70” works. Its seems the range can’t start with a negative value. With an exclusion set, switching classification methods sometimes sets the exclusion to “ 0-0” however the breaks tend to honor the original exclusion. Same problem with Jenks. Maybe this just has to do with the negative ranges. No issue with positive exclusions. Applying an exclusion sets the method drop down to blank. Data exclusion “-70” is read as 0-70. Any change to the raster layer symbology causes the layer to become unselected in the contents/symbology display. It's not a major issue, but annoying to have to keep re-selecting the layer in the table of contents. bug symbology (sorry if you seen this before, I posted this in the under the less-than-ideal forum subgroup)
... View more
05-03-2017
03:31 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1172
|
POST
|
Create Civil 3D (TIN) Surface Export to LandXML (Verified that a projection is defined in the LandXML file) Run LandXML to TIN tool in GIS (tried both ArcGIS Pro and ArcMap) TIN produced does not have a projection defined. Define Projection tool does not work (tried both ArcGIS Pro and ArcMap). End up assigning using ArcCatalog (right click on TIN in Catalog Tree ->Properties -> XY Coordinate System)
... View more
05-03-2017
12:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1309
|
POST
|
This bug happens when displaying a raster with classify. For manual classification method (ie removed breaks from another methods), the color scheme will not update or reapply. This bug happens when displaying a raster with classify. Starting with an automated/calculated method (eg. defined interval) and removing a breaks. The method remains on <Defined interval> and any updates to the color scheme resets the classification and the removed breaks return. Data Exclusion: Trying to exclude: “-1000 - -70; 0 - 1000”. It only honors the positive exclusion. “1000 - -70” works. Its seems the range can’t start with a negative value. With an exclusion set, switching classification methods sometimes sets the exclusion to “ 0-0” however the breaks tend to honor the original exclusion. Same problem with Jenks. Maybe this just has to do with the negative ranges. No issue with positive exclusions. Applying an exclusion sets the method drop down to blank. Data exclusion “-70” is read as 0-70. Any change to the raster layer symbology causes the layer to become unselected in the contents/symbology display. This is quite annoying. ArcGIS Pro 1.3.1, Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
... View more
01-11-2017
09:20 AM
|
0
|
4
|
3039
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 11-16-2018 07:11 AM | |
2 | 10-18-2019 01:44 PM | |
1 | 05-03-2017 03:31 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
02-28-2024
10:31 AM
|