Latest Contributions by BillLotz

Calling @KoryKramer, @JackDangermond  updates please!  Or at least tell us it's never going to happen and leave it at that. ... View more

It must not be possible, or surely ESRI would have done it by now! ... View more

Glad I fond this post! Exact same thing happened to me. We had recently restarted our servers and the index looked good, just the groups, even showing content on overview tab, had no content available. I was stumped until I found your simple solution! ... View more

Old post, but I found this (https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/177506/one-to-many-joins-on-a-feature-class-to-a-table) :  To multiply the features do this (available to those who have ArcGIS 10.1 or above). Place the features and table into the same file geodatabase (you must convert Shapefiles/Excel/DBF files into the geodatabase for this to work). Make sure your polygons have a unique ID field that will be preserved (you can create a Long field and calculate the ObjectID into it so that the ObjectID value will not be lost). Do a standard Join of the table (attributes, no spatial data) to the features (spatial data) on the matching field. Note that the attribute table of the features (spatial data) will have the same number of features that it did before, but don't worry about this, they all show up in the next step. Export the features to the same geodatabase as a new feature class (right click the layer from the table of contents and choose export). Note that the number of features in attribute table of the exported features now has the right number of features, the same as the original table (with attributes, no spatial data) or, in the case of a many to many join, a complete set of features for all combinations of features and related records. The features will multiply in a new feature class where every feature will be present (even if it did not have a match in the table) and where there was a 1:M match before, the features will be multiplied to make a 1:1 match of each feature to all of its table entries. The Unique ID field you created in step 2 will allow you to relate the multiplied polygons to the original single polygon set. With the new feature class of multiplied features you can do selections on the table fields, summaries, Spatial Joins, etc. If you want to generate a unique ID value that represents each unique species and disease combination you can use the 10.2 version of the tool described in this Blog post. Having this type of key lets you use it to do standard joins to summary tables and statistics based on a multi-field relationship as a substitute for creating an actual multi-field relationship using a Make Query Table set up. Here is a good reference from esri: https://support.esri.com/en/technical-article/000001228 ... View more

As am I, very frustrating. ... View more

I'm running into the same problem. AGOL doesn't support annotation, so I converted it to polygons and in ArcGIS Pro set the font size and rotation angle from the old annotation fields. Worked fine and looked good in Pro, but unfortunately it doesn't seem any of that is supported in AGOL. Sad, but mostly frustrating. ... View more

Wow, I am looking at migrating from Enterprise to AGOL, but the limitations in AGOL are a big hurdle. I converted annotation to features since annotation is not supported. Got everything to display in ArcGIS Pro using Arcade. Labels sized and rotated based on field from the old annotation features. Unfortunately none of that stuff is supported in AGOL. It seems the limitations are almost to great, let me know when the bugs are worked out! ... View more

2 more years, has there been any change?  It seems like there are a lot of limitation in AGOL, can't publish annotation, cant publish features with a database join. ... View more

Add 1 more frustrated user, little things like this are what had been behind my reluctance to fully embrace/adopt ArcGIS Pro. ... View more

Big difference, thanks for the suggestions! ... View more

Ahh, our firewall is blocking Agisoft since it is in Russia. It isn't real fond of DJI software either! ... View more

I flew a park with several structures yesterday. Increased the overlap to 85-80%. Overall it looks good, but I did lose the edges of the roofs that were on the shadow side of the structures. Any suggestions on fixing this?   ... View more

Better results with the overlap at 80-70% and the Processing Options -> Initial, select the Use Geometry Verified Matching as Trent suggested. The building edges got a little rough between the 2 building, but a big improvement. I'll try a park tomorrow, as long as the wind dies down, with the overlap set to 85-80%. ... View more

Thanks for all the suggestions. I did bump up the overlaps to 80-70%, but I will try the 85-80%, and went back to the lawnmower pattern. The rolling shutter is selected, I'll look into the suggestions, but I don't believe I can control the seam lines. I'll se what happens and report back. ... View more

Thanks for the reply. I have had the rolling shutter option selected, might have gone away when I went back to the defaults, but I believe its elects it based on the camera information. I will check it and try your other suggestions. I have used the lawnmower option (I figured that I would try the cross hatch) and am going to try another test using it later today.  ... View more