Latest Contributions by MasaoMatsuoka

Thanks for the quick reply. That was what we thought but wanted to make sure. ... View more

Yes, it is branch versioned. So, you are saying we must store all dates in UTC. We are doing that currently. The Event Editor is displaying dates that are not correct, so that is the issue right now. ... View more

Thanks for the update. Looking forward to the fix! Do you still recommend to store all the dates in UTC inside Roads and Highways (FromDate, ToDate, Editor Tracking fields, etc)?  ... View more

Amit, Thanks for the quick reply. I have followed the document you linked. The document tells me to set the Time Zone to Pacific Time. That resulted in all the dates shown as the next days. I followed the latest help document instead and set the Time Zone to UTC and Preferred Time Zone to Pacific. That resulted in showing everything in UTC although I set the Preferred Time Zone to Pacific. The attached screenshot from Event Editor is showing a few features that were edited on 12/12. One of the edits were done at 4:04 PM PST (12:04 UTC). EE_TZ-UTC_Prefer-PT.png (Time Zone: UTC, Preferred: Pacific): One is showing as 12/13. EE_TZ-PT_Prefer-None.png (Time Zone: Pacific, Preferred: None): All are showing as 12/13. ... View more

I was thinking something like that. It seems you have lots of routes (I saw your other post). So, this might not be practical. As I mentioned earlier, in my case, once I filled the first gap, I was able to fill the second gap. Since you only have one gap, this is a different case for the same error message. I wonder if you can go through ESRI Tech Support and let them get to the bottom of this issue. So ESRI can actually fix this issue. Sorry, not too helpful here. ... View more

The last status I heard on BUG-000149190 is "Will not be addressed". Do not know if they changed that or not. In my case, there were two gaps in the line. Once I filled the first gap, I was able to fill the second gap. A question remains: "what if we did not want to fill the first gap?" I asked further questions using paid hours, but they did not respond, so I gave up since it is working for now. Your scenario is different since you only have one gap. I still think there is a bug. Only thing I can think of is to temporarily drop the second half of the line. Then add the gap. Then add the second half back in. Sorry, not too much help. Masao ... View more

I encountered the same issue on ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1 after creating a new attribute rule in FGDB. I got the menu enabled after restarting ArcGIS Pro. It seems it does not recognize the addition of attribute rules until I restart. After that I tried this on Enterprise GDB by creating a new attribute rule there, and I also encountered the same issue. However, this time restarting ArcGIS Pro did not help.  ... View more

I went through the tech-support and they filed a bug for this issue: BUG-000149190. ... View more

Thanks again for the explanation. But as far as I know I am already doing this. Each route is not gapped. I start a new route wherever there is a gap.  ... View more

Here is another detail I should mention. At the start and end of the new route I am trying to create there are small gaps between the previous and next routes. The gap exists because this particular state route stops at the overpass and restart under the overpass. The picture below shows an example. The red numbers are the line orders.        ... View more

Thanks for the detailed explanation. Whenever there is a physical gap, I start a new route (but the same line). So, each of the route on that line in the network is not gapped. The gap only exists between different routes. Now I am trying to create a new route (same line) in the gap between two different routes (same line). Do I still need to fill those gaps between different routes (same line)?  ... View more

Thank you all for the reply. All three routes need to have different attributes, so they need to stay as separate routes, but on the same line (a line in a line network) as they are all part of the same state route. We model each state route as a line in a line network. After everything is completed, there will still be a small gaps between the purple and blue (it is too small to see in the picture).  I tried some more and there was another gap earlier in the same line (state route), so I filled that with a new route, then it allowed me to create that blue route. But then when I tried to create another route after that blue route, it gave me the same error again. So I am wondering if I need to fill all the gaps??? Below is the picture of the gap I filled with a fake route. It happens where this state route stops at the overpass, then restart under the overpass. So physically there is a gap. So I created a small route to fill the gap with attribute indicating that the route is not real. On this particular state route, there are several of this type of gaps. We have another network that is derived from this line network, so we need to be very careful about adding fake routes, but if that is required then we can think of ways to do that.   ... View more