Latest Contributions by Manuel_RRegalado

Hello. I just wanted to let you all know that the same thing has happened to me. I have two tile packages that I created about a month ago; 4/11/2018 to be exact. It worked at that time. I didn't use it since and when I checked today it did not download. They are hosted feature layers/tile packages. The offline is enabled as well. I wonder if something changed between early April and late April. Thanks for posting the issue. ... View more

Hello, did you end up solving this issue? I am running into the same problem. In the ArcGIS Server Manager I see the following error but it was only after I added the definition query. ORA-01861: literal does not match format string error ... View more

I forgot to say thanks for the links and especially the FAQ from Oracle.  I was not aware. ... View more

Hi George, 1. Thanks, this sounds good to me! 2. Checking the file difference.  It would be cool if we could just run a command that would output the version but this sounds good too. OK I ran the cksum for the Shapelib and Raster and they are clearly different.   Shape Library /emc02/gisapps/sdeexe102/lib gist > cksum libst_shapelib.so 3801246941 12473072 libst_shapelib.so /emc02/gisapps/sdeexe102/lib gist > cksum libst_shapelib.so.bak 1534200779 12315010 libst_shapelib.so.bak Raster Library /emc02/gisapps/sdeexe102/lib gist > cksum libst_raster_ora.so 1151397453 13043210 libst_raster_ora.so /emc02/gisapps/sdeexe102/lib gist > cksum libst_raster_ora.so.bak 1756219263 12891306 libst_raster_ora.so.bak I made multiple copies of the original (bak2, bak3, etc.) and ran the cksum on those and the results were identical to the *.bak copies.  This helps a lot because we were just looking at the file size before and the Raster libraries were the exact same size! Thanks again for the insight and suggestion!  This is my first time posting and I am experiencing how helpful the community is in only an hour.  Very cool. ... View more