Latest Contributions by PamBrangan

Thank you Nick! It is a huge help to know it is possible. I will give it a try and hopefully will be successful. Thanks. Pam ... View more

I was running into this same issue myself. I'm running 10.1 SP1 and was able to successfully implement this workflow using an existing CA cert. The setup was extremely sensitive and would only work for me when done in the following sequence. 1)Install CA cert. on IIS 2)Enable https and http in AGS Admin. 3)Restart Server (this is key) 4)Log back into AGS Admin. Choose and save settings *again for the "self signed" cert. (the default one) 5)Run web adapter with the "https://xxxxx:6443/arcgis/admin" for admin dir. These items in this specific order were the only way I successfully implemented using SSL with an existing CA certificate while maintaining http & https access. It was  a lot of trial and error to make this work. Hope this helps some of you out there. Thank you, Charlie, for these steps.  I have one question before I attempt to follow your steps.  I am running 10.1 SP1 on AWS and I'm wondering if I need to add the cert to the load balancer in EC2?  And if so, where in the above steps should that be done? I'd appreciate any help folks can offer. thank you. Pam ... View more

Thank you Richard!  That did the trick.  I'm going to save that query for future use. ... View more

Hi Ryan - yest that helps put things straight in my head, thanks! We generated .5 meter contours, but that seems a bit too dense.  What interval did you use - 5 meters?  Did you use the same for all of the places you've mapped? thanks again. Pam ... View more

Hi - We ran into this same problem.  I'm not sure what the exact fix is, but I can suggest a couple of things to check: 1)  be sure that Isvisible field is populated to Yes 2)  be sure the RuleID field is populated to be 1 3)  In the representation properties for the building footprint dropshadow, be sure under general properties Visibility is checked. Hope this helps. Pam ... View more

Thanks Andrew for the suggestion of creating a 9.3 geodatabase and populating in 9.4.  However, I think that is what I have tried.  The problem seems to be in creating the layer package for one of the datasets within the 9.3 geodatabase while using 9.4 and then trying to share that with a 9.3.1 user. In Mike's post on 10/26/09 he says "you will be able to upload 9.4 Layer Packages, and they should be compatible in 9.3.1 clients." I love the layer package option and it is how I share much of my data.  I hope that there will be a fix to allow 9.4 layer packages to be compatible with 9.3.1 clients. ... View more

Hi - I just tried to share a layer package with a customer that is using 9.3.1 and he can't open it. These are the error messages he is getting - 1) Initially tried unpacking the layer package file to get at the layer file, got this: Error opening layer file. 2) Then he tried adding the from the unpackaged geodatabase and got this: Failed to connect to geodatabase. This release of the GeoDatabase is either invalid or out of date [Invalid Geodatabase release] The table was not found. [GDB_ReleaseInfo] The table was not found. [GDB_Release] I was able to open layer package using 9.4, but I got the same errors if I tried to open using 9.3.1 on another machine. the geodatabase I'm packaging the data from is a 9.3 personal geodatabase. Suggests? Pam Brangan ... View more