Latest Contributions by WalidAlmasri

‎08-10-2017

Well, I just tried it and it worked. That's awesome! Thanks for the tip. No way I would have figured that one out But... it does cause a misclose.

‎07-28-2017

This would be useful when you need to construct a corner cut using a specific radius along two boundaries with no noted bearing. Typically, these types of right-of-way takes assume the two boundaries are perpendicular to each other. I'm having trouble in this too because there's no way to draw these properly without me using a 'construction' layer where I use the fillet tool to modify polylines, then note the COGO dimensions and traverse them in fabric. Trying to do this in fabric results in misclosures when they should be 0.000 in these instances.

‎06-15-2017

Thanks for the reply, Dan. I looked at the links you provided and I'm not sure creating a space time cube or doing an emerging hot spot analysis is what I want to do for this information. I simply want to view the data by month to see the where incidents are prevalent and then publish it in a web app. Here are example of the work. In the raster below, I can click through the months to see where incidents are occurring geographically. In the hot spot map below, I can see where there's high confidence of incidents, but I don't believe I can display all the individual hot spot maps like the raster above to show the pattern over time. My guess is that I'm at a licensing limitation, being that I cannot publish the raster as an image service.

‎06-14-2017

I'm trying to put together a web app for a presentation using roughly 40,000 points that I've geocoded over a time period of about 2 years. I've aggregated the points by month and added a date field to each months feature. Using spatial statistics, I've been able to create a point density map showing 'hot spots' by month. Each raster was then placed in a raster mosaic in which I could enable time to. I can go though month by month, showing how the incidents differ. Unfortunately, we don't have the image service extension for ArcGIS server, so I am unable to create an image service for the mosaic. I've tried now using hot spot analysis. I've created a hot spot map for each month. Is there a way to combine this data and time enable it while keeping the confidence level set for each month? Thanks!

‎05-05-2017

I think I posted the same issue here: Construct from parent - Incorrect breakline measurements There's a video in the first post. Glad to see it's been logged a while back, but sad to see that it hasn't been fixed. It's extremely frustrating when trying to use the fabric. I would imagine this is an issue every user has when generating parcels within fabric. I know that it took me 2 weeks to find the work around using the parcel measurement view button. Not sure how people do their edits in fabric, but for me, if I need to build new subdivisions, having this fixed is critical.

‎02-21-2017

Jason, thank you for the reply. Using the method of checking the "proportion with remaining distance" appeared to work where I needed to break my lines. It is a difficult for me to understand why that works. As I understand, proportion with remaining distance is used when the length of an existing line may change due to newer maps coming in having different measured lengths. Proportion adds new lines and flags the old line as unbuildable. In my case, I'm simply trying to follow the new subdivision workflow. Break the subdivision boundary to construct road frontage lines. I don't seem to understand why using the breakline function while the map is positioned using the COGO dimensions (clicking parcel measurement view button) breaks the line incorrectly. Regardless of whether the button is selected or deselected, shouldn't the line break where it's needed since it's calculating the value based on the record dimension of the line? Also, I have noticed that when doing a breakline, a line may become highlighted with a purple boundary (such as the west line in your second parcel photo). Is there a link to documentation describing what that means? Thank you for your help! Walid

‎02-08-2017

I solved my problem, but in the most unlikely of ways. No matter what, trying to construct the lots from the subdivision boundary always produced errors in the breakline dimensioning. I'm drawing this particular fabric from scratch, so I know that the fabric not the issue. I've tried this process using different maps, all did not work out right. Using the workflow also did not fix this issue. I'm able to join the subdivision boundary to fabric without an issue, the issue comes when trying to build my road frontages/lots. After I built this latest subdivision, I did a construct from parent of the subdivision and created a lot - essentially, a copy of the subdivision boundary. Once the lot was created, I did a second construct from parent and started building my road frontages/lots. All of the sudden, I'm not getting breakline issues, or road frontages that will not close from one boundary line to another. Everything fit. Has anyone had issues trying to construct lots from subdivision boundaries? I'm sure that this has to be a bug with the system. The fabric is definitely proving to be a valuable tool the more I learn about it. But, I do feel like I'm spending days trying to figure out a lot of things because the documentation does not accurately depict real world situations. Creating a fabric from scratch is easy, even migrating existing linework isn't too difficult, but adding content to the fabric accurately has been a lot of trial and error.

‎02-01-2017

Here's a video showing my issue. I've tried it on a different PC and did not get different results. Note the use of the parcel measurement button. https://youtu.be/xkJKrGN0CSY I've been heavily involved in migrating our parcels to the parcel fabric. In effort to teach myself to construct the fabric from scratch, I've been following the workflow for adding a new subdivision. I'm able to input the subdivision boundary without any issues. My problems come when it's time to construct from parent and use breaklines to add parcel corners. It seems that the breaklines do not land where they need to be, resulting in incorrect linework when constructed. I assume you must construct your line with the parcel measurement view button selected, meaning the parcel is in its original state prior to being joined. Is this correct? In the image below, the north boundary is broken were required and the west boundary is broken at 63 feet. Upon the traverse of the road frontage, I head south 63 feet from point 8 to 12 and then head west 100 feet to point 9 from 12. As you can see, there is a major issue with alignment at point 9. When I measure the distance between points 4 and 9, I get about 59 feet, which is wrong, even though I typed in the correct breakline measurement Any input as to why this is happening would be greatly appreciated. I've been struggling for days trying to figure out why this is happening. To temporarily fix my problem, I've been drawing the maps as a separate feature and then using the subdivision from CAD workflow to get my lines into fabric. Here's the end result, note the incorrect measure 59.xx which was broken at 63.

‎07-19-2016

The easiest way to create the topology is to do it in catalog. You'll have to right click the feature dataset, point to new, topology. Once it's created, right click and go to properties. From there, you can add your rules such as, polylines must be covered by polygons and polygons must be covered by polylines. Be sure your data is not in use. You may want to read up on the local government model and parcel fabrics. You'll need to DL this information and use their staging data Tax Parcel Editing | ArcGIS for Local Government be sure you enable the local government model on the new fabric. It's probably easier this way than trying to create it from scratch. You'll load your data (polygons and polylines) in type 6/7 and validate that topology (rules are set). See here for my issues and solution to not being able to load the type 7 data into fabric. I too am learning how to use fabric. Load Topology to a Parcel Fabric - Must Contain Features Error

‎07-19-2016

Finally figured it out. Using the staging database, type7arcs & type6arcs feature classes use the domain IrParcelLineCategory which has coded values 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. Well, if you type this field as 7 (as it says you need to do), you will get the error noted above. It just happened to work fine with type6arcs because you type the field as 6, which is a coded value. In addition, the domains do not show up when you add new fields unless your source data is in the same geodatabase as your staging data.

‎07-19-2016

I had this problem and here's the solution. Using the staging database, type7arcs & type6arcs feature classes use the domain IrParcelLineCategory which has coded values 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. Well, if you type this field as 7 (as it says you need to do), you will get the error noted above. It just happened to work fine with type6arcs because you type the field as 6, which is a coded value. In addition, the domains do not show up when you add new fields unless your source data is in the same geodatabase as your staging data.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎11-11-2020 02:25 AM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by WalidAlmasri

Re: Fillet Tool in Parcel Editor

Re: Fillet Tool in Parcel Editor

Re: Is it possible to create a time enabled hot spot map?

Is it possible to create a time enabled hot spot map?

Re: Breakline not working correctly?

Re: Construct from parent - Incorrect breakline measurements

Re: Construct from parent - Incorrect breakline measurements

Construct from parent - Incorrect breakline measurements

Re: Parcel Fabric

Re: Load Topology to a Parcel Fabric - Must Contain Features Error

Re: Problem migrating parcels to parcel fabric

Re: Load Topology to a Parcel Fabric - Must Contai...