POST
|
There is currently a suggestion for a parcel namer tool that functions outside of the fabric. Please follow this link and "Promote" the request. You can also find the request by going to "ideas.arcgis.com" and searching for "parcel namer". http://ideas.arcgis.com/apex/ideaSearchResults?s=parcel+namer&searchButton=search Please get as many people as possible to promote this! temery
... View more
02-09-2012
06:11 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2400
|
POST
|
Yeah, that's basically what i had to do too. Pretty ridiculous if you ask me, but not all too surprising I guess. I should have just stayed with 9.3.1. First no snake pin tool unless you go to the fabric and now very sub par geoprocessing. Yikes.
... View more
05-24-2011
12:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1287
|
POST
|
I guess I can try a file geodatabase next time but I created a new personal geodatabase for this task so I know size isn't the problem in this case. Thanks for your idea though.
... View more
05-23-2011
10:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1287
|
POST
|
No, I was working within a personal geodatabase on my local machine. This slow-down with the field calculator and calculate geometry really hurts our productivity. In 9.3.1 I could publish a new Parcel feature class in about an hour, now, in 10, it takes about 4 hours.
... View more
05-23-2011
06:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1287
|
POST
|
Thanks Christine, I got sidetracked with other projects but now I'm back on validating our topology. I'll look into some of your suggestions. Tom
... View more
05-23-2011
06:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
424
|
POST
|
We manage land records for a county that contains 191,532 parcels. Within the attribute table there are 4 fields which require us the calculate the geometry and 3 fields which which require the use of the field calculator. This took less than 5 minutes per field in 9.3.1 but takes over 20 minutes in 10. This could potentially cause us to go back to 9.3.1 until something is resolved. What in the world is going on? Has anyone encountered this and found a solution? Thanks
... View more
05-17-2011
11:30 AM
|
0
|
23
|
9843
|
POST
|
Thanks for your answer. If I remove the "no gaps" rule then is there a way to address legitimate gaps once in the fabric? Thanks
... View more
05-11-2011
07:08 AM
|
0
|
0
|
424
|
POST
|
I have built a simple topology with the rules "Must Not Overlap" and "Must Not Have Gaps". My problem is that when I validate, the "Must Not Have Gaps" rule is treating the road ROW as a gap between parcels. Is there a way to avoid this or do I have to mark each instance as an exception? I would really, REALLY like to avoid having to do that. Thanks
... View more
05-10-2011
08:53 AM
|
1
|
9
|
531
|
POST
|
I already have. Our PINs are text b/c many begin with zero. ViperPIN is for numeric values. If it's a quick fix to alter the code I'd be interested in knowing how.
... View more
05-10-2011
07:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
459
|
POST
|
Very, very disappointing. We have come to rely on the Snake PIN tool and are now left in the lurch until we migrate into the fabric, which WILL take some time. Pretty typical of ESRI though, I shouldn't be surprised.
... View more
05-06-2011
01:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
459
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 05-10-2011 08:53 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-12-2023
08:09 PM
|