Latest Contributions by BradfordFolta

Hi Robert, Sure enough – removing that copyright symbol from the text message in strings.js did the trick – now it works fine in all browsers! BTW this is a HUGE help having this Street View app available for using in the Web Appbuilder – Thank you so much, really appreciated! -David Booth From: Robert Scheitlin, GISP Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 9:15 AM To: David Booth Subject: Re: - Google Street View Widget 2.0.1 - 04/21/16 GeoNet <https://community.esri.com/?et=watches.email.document_comment> Google Street View Widget 2.0.1 - 04/21/16 new comment by Robert Scheitlin, GISP <https://community.esri.com/people/rscheitlin?et=watches.email.document_comment> View all comments on this document <https://community.esri.com/docs/DOC-2991?et=watches.email.document_comment#comment-23174> ... View more

Using Web Appbuilder 2.0 and the most recent download of the Street View Widget - everything seems to work fine in Internet Explorer and Chrome. However in Firefox I'm getting an error message when the Street View Popup window opens: "initialize malformed URI sequence" and the window does not display the Google Street View.  Any idea what makes this different in Firefox only? The exact same web app page loads and the Street View app works fine in IE and Chrome, so it's just Firefox that has an issue. Here's a screenshot of the error message: malformedURI.jpg - Box ...and here's the URI in the popup window that will not load - Google Street View ... View more

I agree - users pay a LOT of money for products like ArcGIS Server and then all the annual maintenance subscriptions. Nickel and diming the customers for every detail regarding it's use seems over the top and excessive. What's worse is many product enhancements and features touted as included in the next release or free are subsequently removed, and users are then forced to pay down the line if they wish to use them - it's the old bait and switch - seems like the new SOP at ESRI. I just spoke with my ESRI account rep about this - specifically the new policy that prevents you from sharing maps privately unless you purchase a subscription. The reason given was that ESRI has absorbed costs that both Bing and Google have now impressed on them, and it's their way of passing along those costs. To be fair, it was also noted that some folks at ESRI are not happy about the way they've had to change the ArcGIS Online policies. ... View more

Thank you very much for your reply waveguide. That's the answer I feared. It seems to me a bit too much now. ArcGIS server per si is a very expensive product and it doesn�??t seem fair to me that previous functionalities are now �??banned�?� and �??sold separately�?�?......When we go to the What�??s New in xxxx conferences these obscure details are never mentioned�?� I agree - users pay a LOT of money for products like ArcGIS Server and then all the annual maintenance subscriptions. Nickel and diming the customers for every detail regarding it's use seems over the top and excessive. What's worse is many product enhancements and features touted as included in the next release or free are subsequently removed, and users are then forced to pay down the line if they wish to use them - it's the old bait and switch - seems like the new SOP at ESRI. ... View more

Yes - you can publish services from ArcGIS Server and let anyone view them using ArcGIS Online - but the catch is now you have to make those maps you create online Public - so they have to be shared to the world - not good if you have maps/info you don't want to publish in the public realm. It didn't used to be that way (you could share maps privately with groups/users), ESRI changed that policy a few months ago. If you want to keep your stuff private, now you have to buy a subscription. It seems to me that within the past year there has been a policy shift at ESRI that's aimed at removing/minimizing product features/enhancements that used to be included or free, and now making you pay for them. Not only do you have to purchase a subscription to ArcGIS Online, but then you have to buy credits for use. The ESRI convoluted product pricing schemes are (I think intentionally) difficult to grasp and intended to confuse. ... View more

Much needed - would replace manual extraction and formatting of KMZ files using other tools, such as ET GeoWizards ... View more

Much needed - would replace manual extraction and formatting of KMZ files using other tools, such as ET GeoWizards ... View more

I reported the bug for build 1500. It wasn't fixed in build 1700. Still not fixed in build 1750...  Being able to get attribute information is so important to delivering a useful tool to others. Likewise, building an optimized map service, that is, one with scale dependencies for layers that should not be on at small scale is also important on the client-side and server-side. Found this thread after doing another search after posting about this issue myself. Seems like this bug is still alive and well - which I don't quite understand - wouldn't this bug be at or near the TOP of the list to fix? ESRI - can you please respond to this thread and let people know when they will be able to use popups in AGX if they also choose to use scale dependencies for map service layers? ... View more

This is a fairly serious problem for me, and I've got to believe for others as well. I'm finding it hard to believe this issue has not been already dealt with, but I cannot find anything on it. If someone could please respond, it would be much appreciated - I cannot rollout AGX as our default viewer interface to the server until I resolve this. Thanks! I found this from 1-1/2 years ago: http://support.esri.com/en/bugs/nimbus/TklNMDYyNDUx ESRI - is this being addressed? ... View more

I am currently using ArcGIS Viewer for Silverlight to develop web applications. All application developed so far are very nice and accessible on our intranet. The problem emerged now is during   we access the applications on internet. Though I have both a client access and a cross domain at my root (�?�\wwwroot ) doesn�??t access the services we have on our GIS server except the base map from ESRI. Any body with solution? I thank you !!! I have the exact same issue. The map services I have running display fine locally - the services page displays when the URL is loaded in a browser, they also uploaded to arcgis.com and are accessable there, as well as in argis explorer online. So - the services are running fine and accessible from the outside, but in the silverlight viewer I get nothing, no connection, no layers. I've tried cutting and pasting the URL from the services directory and other various path names, but nothing has worked. ... View more