Hi - yes there is but its not a quick fix.
What you would need to do is unjoin and rejoin the parcels in question to eliminate the gaps. If the gaps are really inconsistent between boundaries, you might even want to consider re-entering the parcels. It just depends on the data. I can take a look at your data once its in a fabric and provide a little more insight.
Christine
Parce editing team
I have built a simple topology with the rules "Must Not Overlap" and "Must Not Have Gaps". My problem is that when I validate, the "Must Not Have Gaps" rule is treating the road ROW as a gap between parcels. Is there a way to avoid this or do I have to mark each instance as an exception? I would really, REALLY like to avoid having to do that.
Thanks
I have been working on this for 2 months. I did make ROW polygons, but the topology in the curves is impossible. Plus, once I fix an area...validate, post & reconcile the error comes back. No consistancy with it either. It really shouldn't be THIS difficult.