This content has been marked as final. Show 3 replies
That's more of a language issue than anything else. I'd be afraid to access an iterated object
outside its valid scope.
Yeah, I guess I've gotten too used to working with COM objects, which have a life of their own.
It would be best to create a new Row for update, anyway, using two cursors, so the loop
would need to generate a new update row per processed feature, or cumulate the changes
in the loop, and implement them afterwards.